Hubic.ai
  • Hubic AI
  • EMBARK UPON
    • Introduction
      • Proof-of-Inference (PoI)
      • Proof-of-Weights (PoWg)
      • Why Hubic?
      • Main Actors and Their Roles
      • Architecture Overview
      • Use Case Examples
      • Hubic AI Hub – Model Registry
      • RWA Integration
    • Registry & System Architecture
      • Sovereign AI Agents (On-chain AI Logic Executors)
      • Liquid Strategy Engine (LSE)
      • Proof-of-Weights (PoW2)
      • Governance System
      • Hubic Intelligence Hub (Expanded)
      • Visual System Map
    • Economic Model
      • HUB Token Utility
      • Economic Actors & Reward Mechanics
      • Token Flow Diagram
      • Long-Term Sustainability
      • Optional Enterprise Layer
      • Security & Reputation Systems
      • Summary Table
      • Future Expansion Points
      • Final Notes
    • Program Flow Overview
      • Model Registration (One-Time)
      • Inference Request (User Job)
      • Execution Phase (Off-Chain)
      • Verification Phase
      • Rewards & Settlement
      • Optional Extensions
      • Key Takeaways
    • Real-World Use Case Example
      • Introduction
      • Problem Statement
      • System Actors
      • End-to-End Flow: DAO Delegation Automation
      • Benefits to DAO Operations
      • Extensions & Advanced Use
  • Hubic Economic Engine
    • Tokenomics
    • Roadmap
  • Links
    • Website
    • Twitter
    • Telegram
    • GitHub
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. EMBARK UPON
  2. Real-World Use Case Example

End-to-End Flow: DAO Delegation Automation

PreviousSystem ActorsNextBenefits to DAO Operations

Last updated 6 days ago

This section illustrates how a DAO can execute trustless, tokenizable validator delegation using a zk-model deployed through Hubic. Each step is verifiable, monetizable and enforceable on Ethereum.


🌀 Phase 1: Metrics Collection

The DAO compiles a dataset of validator metrics such as:

  • 30-day uptime,

  • Recent slashing incidents,

  • Average staking APR,

  • MEV activity or commission rates.

→ The dataset is hashed (input_hash) and submitted as part of an inference request.


📦 Example Input Payload:

{
  "validators": [
    {"id": "0xA1", "uptime": 0.97, "apr": 5.4, "slashed": false},
    {"id": "0xC2", "uptime": 0.92, "apr": 5.9, "slashed": true}
  ]
}

🌀 Phase 2: Model Selection & Dispatch

  • DAO references a pre-approved zk-model (model_hash) from the Hubic zkRegistry.

  • Validator contract dispatches the task to an executor node.

  • Model: Hubic-RWA-StakeOpt v1.2

  • RWA Token: StakeOptToken


🌀 Phase 3: zk-Inference Execution

  • Executor loads the model.

  • Runs zk-circuit with DAO-provided input.

  • Produces zk-proof, output_hash, proof_hash.


🌀 Phase 4: On-Chain Verification

  • Verifier contract checks:

    • Model hash matches registry

    • zk-proof is valid

    • Input/output integrity is preserved

  • Emits InferenceVerified event:

event InferenceVerified {
  bytes32 model_hash;
  address dao;
  bytes32 input_hash;
  bytes32 output_hash;
  bool success;
}

🌀 Phase 5: DAO Stake Reallocation

  • DAO smart contract reads verified output (e.g., top 3 validators).

  • Triggers capital movement via staking/re-delegation logic.

  • Records action in DAO log for governance transparency.


🌀 Phase 6: Revenue Settlement

  • Model owner receives 60% of the inference fee (e.g., 0.6 HUB).

  • If tokenized, the fee is routed to StakeOptToken contract.

  • Token holders receive proportional share via payout contract.


From input to execution to payout, every action is backed by math, traceable by DAO, and monetizable through RWA logic.